ACDSee Free gives you a great image viewer that responds quickly. It won't recognize Asian fonts and if I delete a directory from the folders pane it starts defribulating, inhaling 30% of may processor and requiring Process Explorer to kill.ĭespite these few niggling little faults it is still the absolute fastest, most intuitive, most configurable image viewer going.Apps like Adobe Lightroom are great for managing and touching up huge image libraries but they are often slow and resource heavy. While it still mostly works it's got a few rough edges. I keep begging the folks here to puh-leeeeez, oh please update it a bit and make it available again. This makes it fast and stable, unlike a lot of newer software that uses APIs (existing scripts just strung together) and relies on processor speed to do the gruntwork. I've discussed this with the programmers at work and they tell me it was probably written back when real programmers work in code. I use Corel for processing the raw files and Photoshop for a bit of final fussing but ACDSee is used throughout my workflow for browsing, sorting, file management and so on. I'll use it to do a quick sort of a directory full of huge raw camera files (Nikon D4X NEF files) and rename them. It will open one of my 30,000 pixel (630MB) panoramas in a few seconds while other programs like XnView, FastOne, etc choke. I regularly compare it against newer versions and other image viewers and it is still the fastest browser and viewer.hands down, no contest. This thing was pretty much perfect and still runs like a quick little bunny in Win7. I don't think you're in the minority as I run into a lot of folks in the professional world still using ACDSee Classic (or 3.1). Before I have to make the big change next April with some newer version of Windows, hopefully someone can offer a viable solution.aloha I don't mind paying for upgrades or newer versions, but can't find any that work for the basic needs I mention. That has never been repeated on later versions, so far as I can see. I can simply open additional windows and compare photos side by side.sometimes up to six or eight open windows using the Edit feature. One of the features of Version 3.1 that has not been available in later editions is Edit on toolbar, that allows for multiple photo editing simultaneously. At the moment I'm using a trial version of Photo Editor 6 and find it has too many bells and whistles and far too complicated for my needs. Recognizing that companies make revisions and new versions to stay in business, can anyone offer a solution. From what I understand my ancient version will not work on either Windows 7 or 8. Microsoft will no longer support XP after April, 2014 and it's unclear if that would impact the XP mode of Windows 7, too. From what I read, my older programs would still function using that option. The problem I confront is how my old version would migrate across to Windows 7 Professional, which has an XP mode option. I would be in a minority on this Forum, since I'm a total novice and use the program for very basic use only. ![]() Over the years I've tried out later editions of ACDSee and none are as user friendly, basic, simple and easy to use and understand as the 3.1 Version, purchased almost 13 years ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |